Obedient To NATO, Amnesty International and ICC Completely Ignore Alliance's War Crimes



Given the atrocities committed in Misrata, Benghazi, Tripoli and in other brutally occupied towns and villages of Libya the option of allowing the brutal rebels to conquer the rest of pro-Gaddafi population centers is inconceivable — there is now only one option — and that option is to stop inhuman bombing of whatever left of “rebel terror” Libya.
But, Mr Anders Fogh Rasmussen and other bloodthirsty NATO leaders do not agree and the atrocities we feared are unfolding.

From the start of the Libyan rebellion, not only government loyalist, but also black people in Libya have been attacked and lynched by rebel mobs. This has been known by human rights groups and the United Nations as well as by the intelligence agencies, military forces, media and political leaders in the NATO countries — but they have generally kept a lid on it because it does not suit the narrative.
It does not suit the narrative to find NATO sponsored rebel mobs targeting government employees, soldiers and any black people, lynching them and ethnically cleansing whole areas of Libya now occupied by NATO sponsored traitors.

Some human rights Investigations has documented that these lynchings even happened at rebel HQ in Benghazi.
An independent reports say that any area in Libya known to have supported or supports Gaddafi has reportedly been bombed by NATO or been subjected to homes and apartments being burned and looted.

With Sirte, Sabha and Beni Walid being amongst the last areas still flying the green flag high, the rebels claim to be giving these a deadline before they resort to a “military response”, implying that in the meantime, a non-military avenue will be pursued. Yet again, the media fail to highlight the hypocrisy that the rebels’ master, NATO, has been openly bombing these areas.
As in Zlitan, Zawiya and elsewhere, the same NATO and rebels atrocities as those committed in Tripoli, are being carried out in Beni Walid and Sirte . . .

The reports of racial atrocities have reached the mainstream western media, the story has been that the victims are “African mercenaries” despite plenty of evidence to the contrary. It is widely known that Gaddafi’s opponents deeply loathed his rhetoric and policies in support of Black Africa.
Human rights workers on the ground have reported that the widespread allegations of African mercenaries have little or no basis in fact — but this information has been suppressed and the fears of African mercenaries, extremely useful to the rebel side, have been whipped up by the Western media and NATO politicians such as UK Defense Secretary Liam Fox.
The rebel commander in Misrata was very busy with mission to ethnically cleanse Tawergha, the town to the south of Misrata occupied mainly by dark-skinned people — months later that object seems to have been achieved with direct air support from NATO — yet another alliance’s war crime been ignored by Amnesty International.
The entry of the rebel brigade from Misrata — which the Wall Street Journal reports calls itself the “brigade to purge black skin, slaves” into Tripoli, enabled by NATO, led to inevitable round-ups of black people, massacres and abuses of human rights including the slaughter of patients in the Abu Salim hospital.
It has now become clear that the Al Qaeda /Ku Klux Klan types who have taken over in Tripoli, and the rebels generally, are not as welcoming to human rights workers, UN observers and the whole panoply of western intervention as it appeared they might be when they were primarily concerned with spreading pro-rebel propaganda.

It is to be hoped that information about devastating NATO bombings and rebel violent crimes does not continue to be suppressed, reports delayed, excuses found and the black people in Libya betrayed.
The full coverage of rebel racist crimes is essential to protect the population of Libya and also because many black people in Libya live in the south of the country. It is the south (including Sabha in Fezzan) that will be attacked by NATO and the rebels in the coming weeks. Racist atrocities will follow and public pressure on the decision-makers has to be mobilized t prevent more horrific war crimes happened in devastated Libya .

source

Author: StopNATOcrimes

8 thoughts on “Obedient To NATO, Amnesty International and ICC Completely Ignore Alliance's War Crimes

  1. A University of Michigan peer-reviewed study of births in Fallujah (Iraq) published in December 2010 found that of 547 births in Fallujah General Hospital in May of 2010, six years after the all-out US assault on that city of 300,000, in which DU weapons were reportedly used widely, 15% of babies had birth defects–a rate more than five times higher than the global average of 2-3%.

  2. Cities in Iraq where Depleted Uranium (DU) weapons were heavily used, such as Basra, Samara, Baghdad, Mosul and probably especially Fallujah, which was virtually leveled in a November 2004 Marine assault, are showing high rates of birth defects, many of which, along with unusually high rates of leukemia, medical experts say are emblematic of fetal radiation damage.

  3. UNEP started projects about the needs for humanitarian assistance and an environmental cleanup in Kosovo, Serbia and Montenegro. 
While UNEP was called a ‘reference in the scientific community regarding the impacts of DU when used in a conflict situation’, UN allows the further destruction of Libya with uranium bombs.

  4. The UN knows the dangers of Depleted Uranium. In February 2000, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), said that the pollution with Depleted Uranium detected at four environmental hot spots in Kosovo, Serbia and Montenegro, was serious and posed a threat to human health.

  5. Amnesty International was talks about the violation of human rights in Syria. But Amnesty International says nothing about the destruction of Libya with an UN-mandate whereby Libyan civilians are bombed with uranium bombs. There were already 20.000 bombings now and also members of the future Libyan generations will die as a result of the depleted uranium in the bombs. The western ‘free’ en ‘democratic’ world does not talk about these war crimes.

  6. Unfortunately we now have to take any human rights organisation's word with a grain of salt, some of them have even been bought outright by globalist billionaires like George Soros. Amnesty has also called for Western aggression in Syria too, their pronouncements coincide with the will of the powerful too much these days.

    I will only respect a human rights organisation that rules out any form of so-called 'military intervention' in almost all circumstances.

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert.